Bauckham, Richard. “Structure and Composition.” In Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation. New York: T&T Clark, 1993.
Richard Bauckham has proposed the most convincing structure of Revelation among the proposals that I’ve surveyed. Bookending the whole are a prologue (1:1-8) and an epilogue (22:6-21). The major divisions of the book are signaled by the use of “in the Spirit” (1:10; 4:2;17:3; 21:10), resulting in the following structure:
- 1:9-3:22—”vision of the risen who gives the seven messages to the churches
- 4:1-16:21—”vision of heaven…from which develops the whole sequence of judgments”
- 17:1-21:8—the fall of Babylon
though the coming down of the NewJerusalem - 21:9-22:9—the New Jerusalem (pp. 3-4)
Within this
The longest section of the book is 4:1-16:21, and the series of seven seals, trumpets, and bowls mark distinct subsections. He notes that the formulaic repetition of rumblings, thunder, lightning, etc. in with the seventh item in each series unifies the series. In addition, “The judgment of the seventh seal-opening, the climax of the first series, described by this formula in 8:5, encompasses the whole course of the judgments of the seven trumpets,and similarly the judgment of the seventh trumpet, described by this formula in 11:19b, encompasses the whole series of bowl judgments, climaxing in the final, fullest elaboration of the formula in 16:18-21” (p. 8). In addition, an interlocking of the seventh seal and trumpet with the series that follows marks each series as a development of the first.
Between the sixth and seventh seal and trumpet, are intercalations that parallel one another. Bauckham suggests that “these lengthy interruptions in the sequence of judgments delay the final, seventh judgment, and such delay would be particularly felt in oral performance. They serve to incorporate the issue of delay into the structure of the book” (12). He further suggests that the second intercalation (
Bauckham notes that many structures of Revelation struggle with how to handle Revelation12-14. He takes the abrupt beginning of chapter 12 to mark a distinct subsection that intentionally restarts the narrative. In this case, it alludes far back as Genesis 3:15 and more specifically begins with the birth of Christ. “But if John has not integrated this section into the rest of his book at the beginning of the section, he has done so at its end. He links it to the account of the seven bowls which follows by the same technique of overlapping or interweaving as he had used to link the series of seal judgments to the series of trumpet judgments” (16).
This leads Bauckham to propose the following structure of Revelation:
1:1-8 | Prologue |
1:9-3:22 | Inaugural vision of Christ and the churches including seven messages to the churches |
4:1-5:14 | Inaugural vision of heaven leading to three series of sevens and two intercalations: |
6:1-9:1; 8:3-5 | Seven seals, numbered 4 + 1 + (1 + intercalation) + 1 |
8:2; 8:6-11:19 | Seven trumpets, numbered 4 + 1 + (1 + intercalation) + 1 |
12:1-14:20; 15:2-4 | The story of God’s people in conflict with evil |
15:1; 15:5-16:21 | Seven bowls, numbered (4+3) without intercalation |
17:1-19:10 | Babylon the harlot |
19:11-21:8 | Transition from Babylon to the New Jerusalem |
121:9-22:9 | The New Jerusalem the bride |
22:6-21 | Epilogue |
Bauckham, Climax of Prophecy, 22.
David Minnick says
I stumbled upon Bauckham at some point in my survey of the literature concerning Revelation’s structure while writing my dissertation. He makes a comment (I don’t have the book in front of me to quote him) concerning his amazement that Revelation’s structure has proved an enigma to so many when the structural markers John has left for us are so clear. Bauckham’s analysis of Revelation *physical* structure is correct, and in that area, I have found nothing better than his work. He excels in noting what is actually in the physical contours of the text—something not many scholars writing about Revelation are good at.
Revelation’s structure is mixed (for example, John outlines Revelation’s temporal structure in 1:19 in three movements), but Bauckham’s analysis of the physical structure and Revelation’s temporal structure are not divergent (see my dissertation chapter 6).
Incidentally, his work on Revelation’s theology is also probably the best there is at present. Grant Osborne’s commentary introduction is second best.
Brian says
You were the one who pointed me to this resource, and I found it really helpful. Thanks!